![]() But the public mood softened after he married Camilla Parker Bowles in 2005 and she became the Duchess of Cornwall.Īlthough Camilla played a significant role in the breakup of Charles and Diana, her self-deprecating style and salt-of-the-earth sense of humor eventually won over many Britons. It took years for many in Britain to forgive Charles for his admitted infidelity to Diana before “the people’s princess” died in a Paris car crash in 1997. He’s sort of been caught between two worlds: the world of his mother, revered, now beloved and Diana, the ghost of whom still shadows him and then his incredibly glamorous sons.” he has been sort of massively misunderstood. “I think his main frustration is that he has done so much and that. “I think the frustrations are not so much that he’s had to wait for the throne,” Smith told PBS. In the same interview, however, Charles acknowledged that as king, he wouldn’t be able to speak out or interfere in politics because the role of sovereign is different from being the Prince of Wales. If that’s meddling, I’m very proud of it.” “I’ve always been intrigued if it’s meddling to worry about the inner cities, as I did 40 years ago and what was happening or not happening there, the conditions in which people were living. “I always wonder what meddling is, I always thought it was motivating,” he said in “Prince, Son and Heir: Charles at 70,” a 2018 documentary. and 14 other countries, including Australia, Canada, New Zealand and Papua New Guinea, has defended his actions. lest he be seen as unconstitutional,” said Owens, who wrote “The Family Firm: Monarchy, Mass Media and the British Public, 1932-53.”Ĭharles, who will be the head of state for the U.K. And the fact that he’s been flexing, if you like, his political muscle is something that he will have to be really careful with. They’re not meant to have political opinions. ![]() “We know the monarch and certainly the monarch’s family – they’re not meant to have political voices. And it would have been part and parcel of the inquiry to get to the bottom of it.His accession to the throne is likely to fuel debate about the future of Britain’s largely ceremonial monarchy, seen by some as a symbol of national unity and others as an obsolete vestige of feudal history. “If we’d known at the time of Paget we would certainly, certainly have gone and seen him and interviewed him. But this has only come out recently, which is unfortunate. “If there’d been an allegation then that Bashir had produced allegedly fake documents to Princess Diana, which is a criminal offence, we’d have investigated it,” he said. Stevens expressed regret that he and his officers had not interviewed Bashir. The note was written around the time that Diana gave her Panorama interview with Martin Bashir.Īn inquiry conducted by the former supreme court judge John Dyson found last month that Bashir had engaged in “deceitful behaviour” by commissioning fake bank statements to secure the interview. Stevens said his team had found no other evidence during his investigation, codenamed Operation Paget, to support the scenario suggested in Diana’s note. The jury returned a narrative verdict in 2008 of unlawful killing as result of “grossly negligent driving of the following vehicles and of the Mercedes” in which they were travelling. The uncensored version of the note was not made public until 2007 in evidence heard at the inquest into the deaths of Diana and Dodi Fayed. The Prince of Wales was not interviewed as a suspect. Stevens also asked: “Do you know why the princess had these feelings, sir?” and Charles replied: “No, I don’t.” Stevens asked: “You didn’t discuss this note with her, sir?” to which Charles responded: “No, I did not know it existed.” The Daily Mail reported that Lord Stevens read the note to Charles at a meeting at St James’s Palace in London, and then asked him: “Why do you think the princess wrote this note, sir?”Ĭharles replied: “I did not know anything about until it was published in the media.” The Mirror had published part of the note following a deal with Burrell in 2003. “Camilla is nothing but a decoy so we are being used by the man in every sense of the word.” Brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry Tiggy. My husband is planning an accident in my car. “This particular phase in my life is the most dangerous. The note, which was handed to her butler, Paul Burrell, read: “I am sitting here at my desk today in October, longing for someone to hug me and encourage me to keep strong and hold my head high. He was questioned about a note that his former wife had written in 1995 predicting that she would die through “brake failure and serious head injury” in order for Charles to marry his sons’ former nanny, Tiggy Legge-Bourke.įalse rumours were circulating at the time that the prince and Legge-Bourke were having an affair.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |